A significant number of politicians believed that the actions of the Panthers were part of a passing revolutionary phase that followed the numerous global revolutionary turning points in 1968 surrounding the huge escalations of the Vietnam War.
But the protesters in Israel believed their actions reflected deeper concerns within the Mizrahi community. Having felt they missed out on being pioneers before 1948, and finally "proved themselves" in Israel's 1967 Six Day War, they resented all the more their continued marginalisation, watching on as new Ashkenazi arrivals immediately received preferential treatment.
Elie Eliachar, in his posthumously-published English translation Living with Jews, writes about Eastern European/Ashkenazi prejudice and how it kept Mizrahim from pursuing posts in government.
"This phenomenon - the exclusion of Sephardim [an ethnic lineage closely identified with Mizrahim] from decision-making levels - became particularly conspicuous in the process of building a civic bureaucracy after independence," he writes.
"Despite the fact that Sephardim had comprised the great majority in the Mandate civil service, the new government offices were staffed almost entirely without them. Not one Sephardi was found in any position of influence in the political, economic or cultural ministries. The new law courts too were established on a political basis. No Sephardi judges were appointed to the Supreme Court, and only a few of the distinguished group of Sephardi judges from Mandate times were given posts in the lower courts."
The state did not accept that the protests were largely down to the social malaise that the Mizrahi community continued to experience. Even so, the Panthers were briefly successful in encouraging a government commission of inquiry which concluded that Mizrahim had indeed been discriminated against at many levels of society.
The commission had made recommendations to increase budgetary resources, but much of these new budget allocations were subsequently redirected to the security budget following the Yom Kippur War in 1973.
The prevailing establishment in Israel was Labor Zionist - but the Panthers held a mirror up to the Labor "socialists" with their demands for real social change and confrontation with the establishment. In short, the Panthers suggested that Laborites were not as progressive as they had thought.
|
|
The historic Likud victory that year was largely attributed to Begin's success in courting the sizable Mizrahim vote |
|
|
The activities of the Black Panthers eventually petered out, due to internal rifts and the trend of most Mizrahi groups following mainstream political parties.
Israel's 1967 War saw a shift in Mizrahim voting patterns, with many increasingly deciding to vote for the right-wing Likud bloc after the Labor government began to divert money into the Occupied Territories of the West Bank and Gaza - previously under Jordanian and Egyptian control from 1948 - 1967 - and away from the type of development towns largely populated by the Mizrahim.
|
|
|
The 1973 war diverted funding away from Mizrahi communities [Getty] |
Ironically, Israeli settlement of the occupied Palestinian territories - particularly the West Bank - accelerated in 1977 under Menachem Begin's Likud. In fact the historic victory for that party that year was largely attributed to Begin's success in courting the sizable Mizrahim vote, which at the time accounted for up to 60 percent of all Israeli Jews.
Begin acknowledged and spoke of the discrimination that they experienced under the Labor government, and many Mizrahim believed him sincere.
Mainstream left-wing movements in Israel did not respond to this Mizrahim jolt to the right, and if anything the left in Israel became ever-more restrictive in its political focus and ethnic composition.
Absent from even its mainstream grassroots organisations was a working class Mizrahim cadre, with the dominant milieu of the left from top to bottom being predominantly Ashkenazi, bourgeois, urban, secular and well-educated.
Mizrahim felt uneasy in Ashkenazi-dominated movements such as Peace Now, ironically sensing that peaceniks discriminated against them while at the same time backing Arab and Palestinian rights.
Instead, a conservative majority of Mizrahim found a home in Likud, or later, in the Sephardi religious party, Shas. Other more progressive Mizrahim - albeit fewer in number - gravitated towards Mizrahi-dominated movements like Keshet, the Mizrahi leftist Rainbow movement, and Shalom le-Mizrah, Peace for the East[erners] - which echoed the goals of Peace Now and Gush Shalom, but in Mizrahi terms.
Reuven Avergil's own political journey, having co-founded the Israeli Black Panthers, continued on the fringes of Israeli politics after serving for many years as a Knesset Member for the Communist Hadash party.
He currently heads the Tarabut-Hit'habrut Arab-Jewish movement for social and political change. Notably both in Hadash and in Tarabut, Reuven fuses the Mizrahi struggle with Arab causes.
|
|
The Israeli Black Panthers exposed policies that left the Mizrahim feeling excluded in politics, education, employment and more |
|
|
Missed part one of Otman Aitlkaboud's study? Catch up with Jewish Arabs and the birth of Israel's Black Panthers
Otman Aitlkaboud is an Executive Committee member of the Arab-Jewish Forum working on improving relationships between Arabs and Jews in the UK and beyond. He formerly worked at conflict resolution think tank Next Century Foundation and for the European Union External Action service in Armenia. Follow him on Twitter:@OtmanA