What Mamdani means for a US drifting toward authoritarianism

What Mamdani means for a US drifting toward authoritarianism
5 min read

Jeffrey G. Karam

18 November, 2025
Zohran Mamdani’s rise as NYC mayor signals new possibilities, but the US left cannot let its guard down, warns Jeffrey G. Karam.
People were not looking for a progressive poet. They were looking for someone who speaks the language of daily survival. He [Mamdani] named the crisis, rather than branding around it, writes Jeffrey G. Karam. [GETTY]

 

Zohran Mamdani is now the mayor of New York City, the country’s largest and most powerful municipal office. His victory is a rupture in the order of American politics. A rupture in the narrative that the left in the United States is condemned to moral protest, not material governance. A rupture in the assumption that working class coalitions cannot defeat real estate capital at the very heart of American finance.

Nevertheless, Mamdani is a small rupture, not a paradigm shift. American authoritarianism is not undone by a single mayoral race, and the left must be conscious of this.

The US remains on a slow, grinding march toward authoritarian institutionalisation: minority rule normalised, white supremacy bureaucratised, and daily governance colonised by oligarchic interests.

Mamdani’s win reveals openings—but openings at the edges, not at the center. The mayor did not win because he made people believe in the romance of “the left.” He won because rent is impossible, transit is broken, childcare is unaffordable, and tent encampments are exploding across the city.

People were not looking for a progressive poet. They were looking for someone who speaks the language of daily survival. He named the crisis, rather than branding around it.

Trump wins nationally because he channels resentment. Mamdani wins locally because he channels possibility. That is the precise difference. His victory matters not as evidence of national reversal, but as demonstration that counter-power can be built inside local institutions not yet fully captured.

Solidarity not charity

That Mamdani is a son of Uganda and India, raised partly in the Gulf, matters. And that he publicly condemned Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza while American politicians hid behind euphemisms was not identity performance. It was political clarity.

Because if you take Mamdani seriously on Palestine, then he is assuming something most US politicians still refuse to see: you cannot separate housing policy in New York from housing demolition in Gaza; you cannot separate police brutality in the Bronx from the state violence exported to the West Bank. For him, it seems, solidarity is not charity. It is coherence.

The same structures that produce mass eviction and precarity at home are implicated in the military architectures that sustain dispossession and genocide abroad. Palestine is not a foreign policy “issue.” It is a mirror that reveals what the American political system accepts as normal: hierarchy, cruelty, and the expendability of certain lives.

Palestine is not a side note to his class politics. It is, in many ways, the foundation. And this is the clearest sign that the future of progressive politics in the West will not be led by the heirs of white liberalism, but by the children of the global South who intuitively understand how power works.

For forty years, the left wrote the books while the Right took the institutions. Mamdani reverses that equation. He is not theorising inequality, but has chosen to take responsibility for the city that is the global headquarters of inequality. And this is why the reaction from Wall Street will be vicious.

How empires protect themselves

If democratic socialism can govern New York materially, then the foundational myth of neoliberal America evaporates: that alternatives are theoretically interesting but practically impossible. New York will now become a laboratory—not for rhetoric, but administrative fact. If rent control expands, if public transit becomes a public good, if racialised policing is dismantled structurally rather than performatively, then New York becomes proof of concept.

Indeed, Mamdani’s project is expected to face a coalition of landlords, donors, police unions, and a media ecosystem built to suffocate his agenda. Local governance in the US is always a war of attrition. Yet attrition can be a terrain of political invention if working-class constituencies sustain pressure and refuse retreat.

The most vicious reaction will not come from conservative outrage, but from the bipartisan guardians of the existing order: real estate donors, the bond markets that discipline cities into austerity, editorial boards that present professional managerial cruelty as “responsible governance,” and prosecutors who will leak selective investigations to manufacture scandal.

The new mayor will face not only institutional inertia but weaponised procedures.

After all, the American political system does not need tanks to crush municipal challenge. It has regulatory choke points, predatory capital, state violence, and the constant threat of federal intervention. This is how the empire protects itself at home.

The harder truth is this: authoritarianism in the US is not simply a Republican project. It is bipartisan. The national security state is not a right-wing creation. Mass surveillance, policing militarisation, the bipartisan erasure of Palestinian life, the commodification of public goods—these define American governance across administrations.

The problem is not the monster at the top. It is the architecture beneath him.

Cities remain the only spaces where people actually feel the state. Urban government touches heat assistance, transit fares, eviction enforcement, community colleges, and public health clinics. Mamdani’s project is not progressive aesthetics. It is the reconstruction of the public as a lived fact.

If New York proves democracy can transform the daily metabolism of life, then cities become the seedbeds of a new political grammar. National politics is lost to oligarchic capture. But local power can still make alternatives believable again.

Mamdani’s victory does not save American democracy. It is not the revolution. But it is the first serious crack in the wall in years.

Dr. Jeffrey G. Karam is a political scientist at the Lebanese American University (LAU) and a Research Fellow at Freie Universität (FU) Berlin and the Lebanese Center for Policy Studies (LCPS). He is a member of the Arab-German Young Academy of Sciences and Humanities (AGYA) and the editor of The Middle East in 1958, as well as co-editor of The Lebanon Uprising of 2019 and Global Authoritarianism.

Follow him on X: @JGKaram

Have questions or comments? Email us at: editorial-english@newarab.com

Opinions expressed in this article remain those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The New Arab, its editorial board or staff.